The United States has entered a new chapter in financial regulation with the introduction of the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins aka GENIUS Act of 2025. With this, Congress isn’t just attempting to contain crypto, it’s designing the very conditions under which private digital money may be trusted, scaled, and allowed to exist. In doing so, the Act reveals the state’s growing ambition to shape programmable finance through the institutionalization of stablecoins.

From Code to Compliance: The Shift in Trust

For much of its early history, crypto relied on the premise that “code is law.” Trust was embedded in open-source protocols, peer-to-peer consensus, and cryptographic guarantees. But the GENIUS Act offers a different kind of trust engineered by regulation for stablecoin, an entry point into the crypto space.

Under GENIUS, stablecoin issuers must:

• Obtain federal or state licenses depending on size
• Maintain 1:1 reserves in cash or short-term Treasuries
• Undergo third-party audits and provide monthly disclosures
• Implement full AML/KYC compliance

This basically implies that trust becomes a legal infrastructure, not merely a technical architecture. Just as the FDIC and Federal Reserve give legitimacy to banks, reserve mandates and redemption rights lend legitimacy to GENIUS-compliant stablecoins.

Compliance vs Gatekeeping

This is not just a compliance story, it’s a story about monetary gatekeeping. The Act draws clear lines around issuance. Small issuers (<$10B) can only operate under state oversight and large issuers (>$10B) must come under federal control. Decentralized entities, DAOs, and privacy-focused projects find no path forward here. The GENIUS framework appears to prefer scale, institutional maturity, and regulatory conformity over newer startups. On its face value, the bill seems to bring monetary innovation under custodial terms.

Is Stablecoin Money or Asset?

The bill begins by defining a “payment stablecoin” as a digital asset, “designed to be used as a means of payment or settlement.” It omits any other distinction or mention of a different type of stablecoin. But the distinction between money and asset here isn’t very straightforward.

Legally, stablecoins are not declared legal tender. They are not issued by a central bank, nor do they carry sovereign guarantee. This makes them assets in a formal sense. However, the GENIUS Act’s requirements of 1:1 reserve backing, redemption rights, AML/KYC compliance, and institutional oversight treats stablecoins functionally like digital dollars or bank money.

In practice, according to the bill, it will 1) behave like money i.e., stable in value, used for payments, and redeemable and 2) they will be regulated like deposits i.e, backed by reserves and subject to financial rules.

This ambiguity is likely intentional. The U.S. government is enabling private actors to issue dollar-representative instruments without redefining money directly. It’s a way to maintain monetary sovereignty, support innovation, and extend dollar dominance – all without the legal or political challenges of creating a new form of sovereign currency.

Institutionalizing Disruption

What we’re seeing is not the outlawing of stablecoins but their domestication. Innovation is allowed, but only within corridors of state-defined safety. And that may be both the strength and the limitation of GENIUS. While the bill provides a clear legal path for institutions to innovate in the stablecoin space it may concentrate power in a few well-capitalized actors. It also risks excluding alternative monetary models that resist regulation by design, which very well seems to be intentional.

In essence, stablecoins don’t just have to work technically, they also need to work politically.

CBDC alternative

The bill offers a sneak peak into the US strategy. Countries like Nigeria, China, India, including the EU are moving forward with CBDCs to modernize their payment infrastructure. But instead of issuing a retail or wholesale Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), the U.S. is effectively creating a CBDC-by-proxy through the regulated expansion of private stablecoins. Probably to minimize political risk and leverage the private sector for innovation. Regulating the rails, instead of requiring the Federal Reserve to build or manage new infrastructure for issuing sovereign tokens, enables the US to extend the global role of the dollar.

GENIUS-compliant stablecoins can circulate globally and they must conform to U.S. financial norms (AML, reserve transparency, redemption rights) which not so subtly provides an opportunity to enforce U.S. monetary and compliance standards globally.

Conclusion

The GENIUS bill marks an inflection point where we are moving from the decentralized dreams of crypto toward a state-aligned financial architecture where trust is regulated, not coded. It’s the foundation of a new social contract for digital money where the right to issue, store, and transact digital value is granted by the state.

The post A GENIUS Bill? appeared first on Internet Governance Project.